TrustLedger SRMBuilt for the Integrated Social Facilitation Framework
Cabinet approved the ISFF on 1 July 2026. It applies to all spheres of government, state-owned companies and infrastructure stakeholders, and it asks every project to engage communities early, keep lawful channels for concerns, and report on what was done. TrustLedger keeps that record.
The implementation guidelines are still being written by the Department of Public Works and Infrastructure. TrustLedger is built for the framework; it is not certified or approved by it.
Why it matters now
- It is binding. The framework applies across national, provincial and local government, state-owned companies and infrastructure stakeholders, starting with the highest-risk projects.
- Disruption is costly. The Minister of Public Works reported in July 2026 that construction mafia activity had disrupted more than 180 projects worth nearly R63 billion.
- Facilitators are being professionalised. The SACPCMP is creating a registration category for social facilitators, so the work will need a professional record.
What the framework asks, and how TrustLedger answers it
Every module below is on every TrustLedger plan.
The ISFF asks for
Social facilitation across the whole project, from pre-initiation to close-out
The problem on site
Engagement starts when construction starts, and the plan lives in a tender document nobody opens again.
How TrustLedger answers it
- The engagement plan composer reads the tender or briefing and maps seven phases, from inception to close-out
- Once the work is awarded, the plan seeds stakeholders, engagements and commitments on the live desk
The ISFF asks for
Stakeholder mapping and community profiling
The problem on site
Each new facilitator rebuilds the stakeholder list from scratch, and nobody knows which ward a structure belongs to.
How TrustLedger answers it
- A stakeholder register for people, groups, councillors, committees and local structures
- South African municipalities, wards and traditional councils built in, with Stats SA baseline cards on featured places
The ISFF asks for
Project liaison committees as the formal platform for communication and conflict resolution
The problem on site
The liaison committee meets every month, but its decisions and promises sit in one secretary's minutes.
How TrustLedger answers it
- Every meeting logged with attendance, decisions and follow-ups, all dated
- Promises made at the committee become commitments with an owner, a due date and evidence
The ISFF asks for
Lawful, transparent channels for communities to raise concerns
The problem on site
Without a lawful channel that works, people use the one that does: stopping the site.
How TrustLedger answers it
- A grievance desk where every complaint gets a case number, an owner and a deadline
- A QR-coded receipt and a public status page the complainant can check without calling anyone
The ISFF asks for
Local enterprise databases and contract participation goals
The problem on site
Local procurement promises are made in public, but nobody can show which local businesses were found or used.
How TrustLedger answers it
- A local business desk where businesses register and your team records checks and documents
- Ask plain questions, such as "CIDB grade 1 contractors in ward 9", and keep local spend evidence for reporting
The ISFF asks for
Skills development and fair treatment of local labour
The problem on site
Local workers leave the project with nothing to show the next employer.
How TrustLedger answers it
- Appointment records with performance notes and the worker's own response at close-out
- Reference letters and performance certificates, sealed so anyone can check them
The ISFF asks for
A risk-based approach, with the highest-risk projects first
The problem on site
The signs of a stoppage were in the records, but nobody joined them up in time.
How TrustLedger answers it
- Social risk early warning by ward: overdue promises, late complaints, repeat complaints and falling mood
- Every warning explains its causes, and every response is dated
The ISFF asks for
Continuous monitoring and regular reporting
The problem on site
Reports to the client, the department and funders are rebuilt from memory every month.
How TrustLedger answers it
- Monthly, executive and board report packs built from the dated record
- A public promise tracker the community can follow, with a seal showing nothing was edited
Sources: Ministry of Public Works and Infrastructure, 7 July 2026; SACPCMP.
Start the record before the guidelines arrive.
Every module on every plan, from R1 999 a month (excl. VAT). Try it free for 14 days on your own project.